Friday, September 9, 2011

A Land In Limbo


PM Manmohan Singh is on a visit to Bangladesh on 6 and 7th of September. This visit was touted as historic and of import by the media and there is reason to do so. This was first in last 12 years when an Indian PM was on a visit to our eastern neighbor. The visit was of crucial significance within the context of India’s bilateral agreements involving the disputed border and sharing of teesta river water between both the countries. This was aptly referred to by the economist as 'a watershed agreement in the annals of a bizarre geography'. In this context, it would be interesting to know the current state of affairs in the relations between the two countries and more interesting, to study what makes this geography so unique.
The border that we share with Bangladesh unlike our other geographical neighbors such as Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives or Myanmar, has one of the most bewildering feature called "enclaves complex" which exist along Bangladesh's northern border with India and is called Cooch Behar enclave complex. The story behind this enclave complex is too compelling to tell and has deep historical and political bearings.
An Enclave, as Wiki puts it, is a territory whose geographical boundaries lie entirely within the boundaries of another territory i.e. fragments of one country which are entirely surrounded by other. The word "enclave" entered into the dictionary of British diplomacy in 1868 and owes its etymological origin to Latin word "clavus" which means 'embedded and surrounded'.
In his book "Stateless in South Asia: The making of the India Bangladesh Enclaves”, Wilhelm Schendel refers to about 250 such enclaves surviving in the world today and are found mainly in three geographies - western Europe, eastern fringes of former soviet empire and south Asia. Most of the enclaves in south Asia are found along the borderland of India-Bangladesh. Cooch Behar, as the territory falling into the Indian side of the border called, is a district in north Bengal which once had been the seat of the princely state of Koch Bihar, ruled by the Koch dynasty. Cooch Behar possesses almost 200 exclaves out of which 106 are in Bangladesh. Of those, 3 are counter-enclaves (enclaves within enclaves) and world’s only counter-counter enclave i.e. a patch of Bangladesh that is surrounded by Indian Territory itself surrounded by Bangladeshi territory.
The border between India and Bangladesh runs for 4096 km where its entire stretch  splits up into flat/plains (in West Bengal, Assam-Barak Valley, Tripura), riverine (southern extremity of West Bengal border and of Assam) and hilly/jungle (in Meghalaya). Along its length it touches border with Assam, Tripura, Mizoram, Meghalaya and in the longest stretch 2,217 km with West Bengal.
In his scholarly work titled Waiting For the Esquimo, Brenden Whyte chronicles the history of Bengal and of Cooch Behar dating from Mughal and British period (1500-1950) to Indo-Pakistan period (1947-1970) till formation of Bangladesh in 1971. It would be worthwhile to spend some time on the crucial periods of this history.
The Mughal Period
About 1200 AD much of the Bengal was conquered by Muslims enlarging the Mughal Sultanate except the northern part which was overrun by local tribes called Koch. During the same time, Assam was ruled by Asom dynasty. Muslim rulers from central and south Bengal, under the patronage of Mughals tried several times to attack and occupy kingdoms of north Bengal,  but could not succeed. 1500 - 1600 AD saw the rise to power of Koch dynasty, the rulers of Behar. Around that period, Muslim rulers such as Sher Shah Suri, Suleman Kararani who ruled Bengal, invaded this region several times. Finally, Emperor Akbar removed Kararani from Bengal and added it to Mughal Empire with Koch’s help.  However, the powerful landlords of Cooch Behar retained possession of their land surrounded by the area of Mughal state giving a tough fight to the Mughals. The period between 1600 -1700 AD was chaotic due to dynastic wars and fight for succession within Koch Dynasty. Taking advantage of this condition, Mughals under Eebadat Khan begun occupying the outlying regions called Chaklas, of the dynasty. These Chaklas were established by Mughals replacing the previous divisions called Sarkars for easy administration and Zamindars of these and nearby Chaklas paid allegiance to Mughal. The remaining region remained under control of Kochs.
Whyte lays importance on the crucial peace treaties happened in 1711 and 1713 between the kingdom of Cooch Behar and the Mughal Empire which ended a long series of wars in which the Mughals wrested several districts from Cooch Behar thus leading to the formation of enclaves. This is because the Mughals were not able to remove some of the powerful overlords of Cooch Behar from some of these Chaklas. So these lands were still held by these chieftains even though they were annexed from that state and were ‘enclaved’ in Mughal land. Similarly other side, disbanded Mughal soldiers who occupied lands inside reminder of Cooch Behar retained their allegiance to Mughal Empire although detached from it and ‘enclaved’ inside Cooch Behar. The Mughal Empire never considered these enclaves as problematic as they lacked the scientific methods to earmark boundaries.
The British Period
Over time Mughal Empire disintegrated and eventually the Nawab Nazir of Bengal became the de-facto ruler till the time East India Company established itself in India in mid-18th century. After Robert Clive defeated Siraj-ud-daula at Plassey in 1757, Mir Jafar, uncle of nawab, was enthroned who was later replaced with his son-in-law Mir Kasim. The control of Bengal was slowly passed onto East India Company with the granting of Diwani of Mughal Bengal and enclaves of Cooch Behar.
The company accidently in 1814 discovered existence of Cooch Behar enclaves, their jurisdictions being held independent of company control and had no authority of magistrate. Such regions were then natural sanctuaries for notorious offenders fleeing the police.
British indirectly ruled north Bengal, and so the Maharaja and his administration were retained under their rule and eventually Cooch Behar survived as princely state till the end of colonial rule. Being the principality, Cooch Behar saw little unrest for independence from British rule.
Post-Independence
After the colonial rule ended, princely states had only two options either to join India or join Pakistan. Cooch Behar was end up being wedged between India and east Pakistan. As Wilhelm Schendel puts it succinctly “The Mughal outliers in Cooch Behar had become part of British India and then part of Pakistan, whereas the Cooch Behar outliers in Mughal territory had become part of princely state and then part of India”. Eventually in 1971, as a result of Bangladesh liberation war and Indo-Pak war, East Pakistan seceded to form Bangladesh. Remarkably, even after being a part of such an eventful history involving frequent changes in dominion, the enclaves survived.
Post 1971
Relations between India and newly formed Bangladesh were pleasant since solving the boundary problems were not on the priority of newly formed independent state.  In 1972 signing of trade agreements led to trade movements across border in specified commodities. The agreement expired after one year and then never reinstated. In 1974, a treaty was signed between two countries called Indira-Mujib Treaty. This treaty listed 15 sectors of boundary to be demarcated and agreed that enclaves of both the countries in others region shall be exchanged expeditiously with no compensation for loss of Bangladesh and with exception to few enclaves which shall be retained by Bangladesh. India also agreed to lease an access corridor between Dehagram and Bangladesh known as Teen Bigha. Teen Bigha was one such attempt to connect the Bangladeshi enclaves to their ‘mainland’.  India ratified this agreement in 1980 after passing a bill in parliament. However, the implementation did not happen due to 1) Dispute regarding the transfer and terms of lease of Teen Bigha to Bangladesh 2) an ongoing dispute regarding use of this land by anti-India elements and illegal immigrants to cross over into India, and the agreement remained a pipe dream. After lot of political and social hullabaloo, eventually in 1992 Teen Bigha was transferred to Bangladesh.
The condition of those stuck in those enclaves is beyond what we call livable. They are virtually cut from all amenities like water electricity roads, hospitals, schools etc. They are trapped into a no-man’s land with limited ingress to their ‘mainland’ and even need a visa to get that access. This resulted in rise in illegal border crossing.
Fencing the Border
Border between India and Bangladesh is highly porous which also makes it highly conducive to illegal immigration and smuggling of goods. To curtail this, in late 1984, Indian Government announced its plan to fence the border. The construction started in two phases. Phase I began in 1987 and completed fencing only 20% of border while Phase II started in 2000. BSF was deployed to guard the border. However, the illegal immigration continued and over time condition worsened due to rise of terrorism. This border became notorious for enforcing a shoot-to-kill order against Bangladeshi migrants by BSF.
Notwithstanding the daft of agreements between both the countries, little progress has been made from both the sides raising ire of the people trapped between disputed borders. The economist puts this plight of those living in this limbo pertinently-
“A few years ago, away from Cooch Behar, on the eastern border with India, I met a man who lived smack on the border between Tripura state and Bangladesh. His living room was in Bangladesh, his toilet in India. He had been a local politician in India, and was now working as a farmer in Bangladesh. As is typical in such places, he sent his daughters to school in Bangladesh, and his sons to India, where schools, he thought, were much better. To his mind, the fence dividing the two countries was of little value. But, he conceded, “at least my cows don’t run away anymore.”
Sources: 
http://www.economist.com/blogs/asiaview/2011/02/enclaves_between_india_and_bangladesh
http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan
Waiting for the Esquimo by Brendan Whyte
Stateless in South Asia: The making of the India Bangladesh Enclaves by Wilhelm Schendel

No comments: